About Contact Subscribe Advertise The Hollywood Reporter
The Hollywood Reporter

« First look: 'Star Trek' cast visits 'Family Guy' | Main | NBC pulls 'Chopping Block' »


March 26, 2009

Discovery's 'Universe' promises to rule History

Universe
  Property of History Discovery

Discovery Channel announced Thursday a new project that aims to do for outer space what "Planet Earth" did for polar bears. "Stephen Hawking's Universe" is a multi-million-dollar three-part special that uses the physicist's theories and expensive-looking CGI to tell you everything that scientists highly suspect about our galaxy and beyond.

"You got the greatest living mind in the universe and we’re taking his knowledge and presenting it to people with fabulous computer graphics," says Discovery president and general manager John Ford. "We start at the beginning of time, then go into whether time travel is possible, whether we are alone and some of the great questions."

Which sounds awesome for us astronomy buffs, and will probably be another content cash machine for Discovery. Can't you already imagine the "Universe" Blu-ray DVD selling like crazy on Amazon.com? Wait ... it's already listed on there. How did ... oh, that's a DVD of the History Channel's "Universe."

See, Discovery's cable rival has a series in its third season that's also called "Universe" that likewise explores the mysteries of the cosmos in high-def with snazzy computer graphics. 

But Discovery promises their "Universe," which comes out next year, is going to wipe the floor with History's "Universe."

"'Universe' is a good show, but it's a weekly series on a weekly series budget," Ford says, laying it down. "What we’re doing is a multi-million-dollar investment ... We plan it to be truly an immersible experience. When we take you to Mercury you’re going to feel like you’re on Mercury."

Damn straight.

1. Discovery has Hawking. And Hawking, man, he has a string theory about antimatter that History doesn't even know about.

2. Though Hawking will lend his theories to Discovery's project, he won't be narrating, which is ideal. 

Hours of listening to Hawking's synthetic voice would, let's be honest, take away from the fun of whooshing between Saturn's rings. An actor who has played Hawking in previous projects will narrate instead. (It should be noted here that Hawking could sound like Ian McKellen nowadays if he wanted to. He reportedly still uses the same Speak & Spell robot voice to communicate because he considers it to be his trademark. It's odd that the GPS in your car uses more advanced voice technology than the world's most famous theoretical physicist, but there you go. Though even if Hawking's voice was used, the man still manages to project more warmth than "Planet Earth" narrator Sigourney Weaver.) 

3. As Ford points out, they're going to spend a bunch of money.

History's "Universe" is pretty good, but the experts interviewed on the show seem like they're the people at their respective institutions who give tours to the fourth-grade classes on their field trips. Yet as hard as they try to talk down to History's audience, they don't always succeed and sometimes blurt out incomprehensible tidbits. The result is feeling like you're being condescended to by somebody who is legitimately way too smart for you (see Clip 1, below). How does Discovery spending more money on their project solve this issue? Dunno, but it can't hurt. 

4. Discovery's "Universe" will be much shorter than History's.

As fun as History's "Universe" is to watch while doing crunches in your living room, the show seems like it's starting to run a bit dry of material despite having infinity to play with (see Clip 2, the "Sex in Space" episode).

"If we pull this off, this will do for the universe what 'Planet Earth' did for here," Ford says. "We hope to scorch the earth for anybody who wants to follow us, at least for a few years."

I love that the president of a natural-world cable network is willing to scorch the earth with his project's planned supremacy. At this point I'm picturing Ford with blue face paint rallying his CGI team for battle. Discovery vs. History. The universe isn't big enough for the both of them.

PREVIOUS: Buzz Aldrin's freaky space travel story



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d69069e201156f5fd549970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Discovery's 'Universe' promises to rule History:

excellent article. could use a few more definitions, e.g., "string theory" severral tech words.

long

excellent article. could use a few more definitions, e.g., "string theory" severral tech words.

long

If you don't know what string theory is than you're a bloody moron

"Hours of listening to Hawking's synthetic voice would, let's be honest, take away from the fun of whooshing between Saturn's rings."

Seriously!! You are idiots!! Hawkings voice has made crappy techno cool, family guy funny, and the stars alluring. Use of Hawkings voice would add luster, mystery and COOL. It would work for the show for the same reason the most known physicist in the world keeps his voice that way.

@podgey: But even bloody morons know the difference between "then" and "than."

@podgey: Before getting into the theory stuff, perhaps you should study your grammar first. Every sentence ends with a period.

Looking forward to this.
I lost all respect for History Channel's "Universe" with their Bizarro world multiple universe episode. That was stupid.

Steven Hawking calls me from my library to tell me when my books are in. This seems right. It would be odd if Ian McKellen called.

Note to all astrophysisis!!
Discovery Channels urgently requests all footage of monster trucks and two headed babies in space. (explosions optional)

Note to Nobel commitee judges.
Please excuse all astrophysis cooperating with Discovery Channel.

why can't they use harnesses attached to the wall of the ship to give resistance to the two people instead of marketing ridiculous and expensive gimmicks?

shopped

There was a PBS series with "Stephen Hawking's Universe" as a title, too. Dunno if they're related, but the PBS one came out in 1997.

@podgey - Arrogance like yours is part of what suppresses popular interest in science. Your literacy level doesn't help your credibility either.

Is there inteligant design?
GodYesOrNo.com

"If you don't know what string theory is than you're a bloody moron"- Podgey

If you don't proof read before posting you're a bloody fool.

Post a comment











Sign up for The Live Feed daily email newsletter:

If you wish to only receive the morning ratings, get the Hollywood Reporter's ratings alert.
Follow us on Twitter;
Subscribe using RSS.
New: The Live Feed mobile-friendly version.
Get headlines delivered to your Google or Yahoo homepage:
 Add to Google Reader or Homepage








Ain't It Cool News - Coaxial
Deadline Hollywood Daily
Drudge Report
Fancast
Fark: Showbiz
Gawker
Hollywood Reporter
Hollywood Wiretap
Huffington Post
Just Jared
Lisa de Moraes
Michael Ausiello
NielsenWire
NY Post: Vulture
Perez Hilton
Pop Candy
Reality Blurred
Television Without Pity
Televisionary
The Futon Critic
The Wrap
THR BLOGS: Hollywood Reporter Pilot Log
THR BLOGS: Risky Business
THR BLOGS: Showbiz 411
THR BLOGS: THR, Esq.
Tim Goodman: The Bastard Machine
Time's Tuned In
TV Barn
TV by the Numbers
TV Decoder
TV Squad
TV Tattle
TV Tracker
Backstage Brandweek Editor and Publisher Billboard Adweek Mediaweek