Why so serious? Don't move digital transition

Re: Barack Obama to ask Congress to push back the Feb. 17 digital TV transition 

I'm entirely against moving this date -- again. You show cowardice and keep flinching and viewers will never buy those digital converter boxes. They'll know they have the upper hand and will walk all over the industry, flaunting their square-shaped 27" analog sets, laughing as they continue to watch "CSI" in standard definition.

And what about all those public service announcements that networks have aired heavily for months? You want to make liars out of them? If people decide they can no longer trust PSAs, won't teen pregnancy and smoking rates go through the roof? "The Less You Know ..."

Of course, only our government would schedule this transition during the February sweeps in the first place. Nielsen had to push the sweep to March to get out of the way, which also ensures any year-to-year sweeps ratings comparisons are all but useless.

"It's almost as if the government chose the date without talking to anyone who actually works in television," IM'd one network exec.

Believe me. I embrace any social Darwinism havoc wrecked by doing this on Feb. 17. Please-please-please FCC, flip the switch during "American Idol." I imagine Heath Ledger's Joker nodding approvingly -- "The FCC, they made plans, look where it got them."

But if they do move the transition to minimize the impact on networks and viewers, um [blogger tentatively raises hand] why not move it to, oh, gee, I dunno ... the summer?

AFTER THE JUMP: REPRINT OF MY COLUMN from July 7, 2008: Commentary: Much ado about digital TV switch; a lot of concern over little

Booths hawking survival products pack a Phoenix-area church. Vendors sell gasoline generators, water purifiers, grain grinders, solar cookers, gold coins and portable radios.

The year was 1999. Y2K, the millennial apocalypse caused by a computer programming bug, was coming.

Spurred by worst-case scenario media reports, local residents wanted to be prepared. Some actually built bunkers to protect themselves -- presumably from the roving cannibal hordes that will take to the streets once traffic lights stopped functioning.

So little faith in society's ability to handle a potential lapse of a public utility.

And not entirely unlike the worries over the impact of the digital TV transition.

"For older Americans who rely on television for companionship, for another voice in the house, that loss could be devastating," a recent Newhouse wire service story fretted. The story also quoted Wisconsin Sen. Herb Kohl saying, "If you don't prepare for it, then it will overtake us, and it will be a huge crisis."

Senator, relax. Just because a problem is widespread (in that it impacts many people) doesn't mean it's a widespread problem (in that it will have significant ramifications).

And a broken appliance is not a "huge crisis" ... unless it's a dishwasher.

The worst-case scenario worries over the digital transition assume viewers who have not made the switch by Feb. 17 will need their TVs immediately thereafter and not know what to do if their sets stop functioning. Broadcasters are so concerned, they successfully lobbied Nielsen to take the unprecedented step of pushing back the start of the February sweep to March.

Conveniently, the very people most likely to be disturbed by the transition -- those who watch a lot of TV -- are the same people most likely to be informed when it finally happens, having heard repeated warnings about the switch from morning shows, local news and public-service announcements. So, in a sense, the digital transition is a self-solving problem: TV watchers will know about the switch from watching TV, or will be among the first to learn their analog service is cut off.

A Nielsen survey in January found that only 10% of households receive television signals solely via over-the-air transmission. And by all measures, the number of consumers aware of the transition has grown rapidly: According to Magid, awareness hit 59% this year. A National Association of Broadcasters survey put awareness even higher, at 79%. Last month, Leichtman Research Group claimed that number has reached 84%.

These numbers often are used to show that a significant percentage of the public remains unaware of the transition. But let's put the data another way: More Americans know about a wonky FCC transmission policy decision than can name the three branches of government (40%, by one survey) or the current vice president (69%, by another).

Teaching three quarters of the American public anything is astounding -- and the switchover is still seven months away. (Granted, the bulk of these consumers are aware of the transition, yet still don't know precisely what to do about it.)

As for the expected broadcast ratings drop, Nielsen projects that merely 3% of its household sample will have at least one set that won't work on Feb. 17, which isn't to say they won't have at least one that will.

There's also a media presumption that consumers who haven't made the switch yet must be oblivious. The thing is, consumers procrastinate. The TV-buying holiday season is still ahead. When it comes to bargain hunting for consumer electronics, there's no better rule of thumb than "wait until November."

The only real civic concern here is if a household is ignorant of the transition and depends on their TV for severe weather warnings -- then you throw in an inconveniently timed flood, hurricane or tornado. If you live in a severe weather state, however, you know that few rely solely on TVs during a crisis because the power often goes out. You turn on the radio, you check weather on your cell phone or call your neighbors.

Oh, there is one difference between Feb. 17 and Y2K: Whereas the dawn of the new millennium disappointed doomsayers, next year the media will still manage to get a juicy morning-after story.

They will go to a Best Buy and interview patrons waiting in line with a digital converter box.

"I turned on my TV this morning," a bewildered consumer will say, "and there was no picture."

Strangely, this moment will be used as an example of how a problem was not solved.

Comments

[Jon Bell]

"Of course, only the FCC would schedule this transition during the February sweeps in the first place."

Don't blame the FCC. The February 17 date was chosen by Congress, in its collective wisdom, as a compromise between (as I recall) January 1 and April 15.